I completely agree with the points made by Darren Crovits, in
regards to his position on DOL’s, and how there effectiveness is minimal
because they are not tuned to the students learn. DOL’s from what I can remember
only critic one style of writing—American Standard English. This automatically
sets students up for failure because the teacher is essentially assuming the
student “should” know the correct grammatical form. I can see this being
harmful for ESL students, because they are not learning the “why” or how to
look for it in their personal live. Thus making a permanent change rather than focusing
on how to get the points. Crovitz mentioned how language errors were primarily treated
as learner deficiency rather than an opportunity for the instructor to demonstrate
another that applies to the way that students learn. Which is nonsense, since
it would be the ethical thing teachers are supposed to do, right? I understand that
teachers “barrow” lesson plans, pedagogies and, other insightful material. Yet
at this point Crovits (I believe) is showing how indolent it is making them. DOL’s take up about ten-fifteen minutes of class time,
if the focus is only on how to make the sentence correct, that does not leave
time for the why and how for those who don’t understand. Thus the saga of red
marks continues.
To combat this problem, my group
and I have come up with an alternative DOL lesson that focuses on the context and
situation. Our task was to transform simple sentences into another way of
saying them. An example(s) from the article was:
Starter sentence:
You’re
fired.
Transformed sentence (basically another way of saying
something):
Sorry,
Bob, but with the poor economy we have to let you go.
I’m
breaking up with you.
My group and I came up with three starter
sentences of our own:
Lemme geta
numba nine wit some mac sauce (Almost everyone I know back home
orders from McDonalds like this…even Beyoncé)
Dude let’s
hangout!
President
Obama, it was my absolute pleasure and joy getting to chauffeur you around.
Within our lesson plan, I believe our goal is in essence to teach
our classmates how to codeswitch; in their writing and while they are dealing
with certain groups or people. Like—you wouldn’t
talk to me—a student and friend and manager and coworker and club member the
way you would your mother or boyfriend or sister or professor. This lesson
will prepare them to deal with a mass of different types and kinds of people
because of diverse saying one thing can be. To make sure our classmates truly
understand our lesson we will give each group a series of sentence and ask them
to transform them. Then, choosing the one they like they will act it out and
give a short explanation of how transforming the sentence change the context (relationship)
of the situation. I think this also help our classmates with reading material
from other classes as well since they will be able to differentiate the
material accordingly rather than seeing every piece of reading material as a
chore or a textbook. (If they do not already like reading)
Hi Shakayla!
ReplyDeleteI basically hold the same opinions you do on this subject. But I didn't consider the ESL students! I am really glad that I read this post because it reminded me that I will have students in my classes that speak English as a second language or not at all yet. Your goals for teaching how to code-switch are interesting and I can't wait to dive into them tomorrow!
Where you used the grammar patterns this week I believe made your writing stronger and flow better. You are an excellent writer in my opinion!
Hi Shakayla!
ReplyDeleteI basically hold the same opinions you do on this subject. But I didn't consider the ESL students! I am really glad that I read this post because it reminded me that I will have students in my classes that speak English as a second language or not at all yet. Your goals for teaching how to code-switch are interesting and I can't wait to dive into them tomorrow!
Where you used the grammar patterns this week I believe made your writing stronger and flow better. You are an excellent writer in my opinion!
I liked your post. I agreed with your point that DOL’s take up about fifteen minutes of class time that could be dedicated to explaining why certain grammar rules exists and just giving this time for students to understand what they’re doing right and expand that instead of only telling them what they need to work on. I think you did a great job at making compound sentences by using a comma and one of the coordinating conjunction. I think a place where you could have tweaked it was in your sentence that started with the “I understand that teachers “barrow” lesson plans….” I think when you used yet to start out your sentence that sentence could have been shorted and cut down. By doing that I think it will really show the rhetorical fragment and what you’re trying to emphasize is the point that Crovits is making.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your use of dashes at the end, the compound sentences are very effective in your article.
ReplyDelete